Universidad Station, 45 Trains, and the Match-Day Logistics Question V.League Has Not Answered

A January in Da Nang. I am sitting in a coffee shop on Nguyen Chi Thanh Street, waiting out the last rain of the season, reading the news from Mexico City. The city government has just announced a renovation plan for Metro Line 3: 40 billion pesos of investment, 45 new trains, 21 stations upgraded, and one very specific commitment — no station will close during 2026, with the bulk of construction pushed to 2027. El Universal carried the story, calm in tone, precise with figures, the kind of infrastructure report I have read thousands of times in my life.

Then I stopped at a name on that list of 21 stations: Universidad.

I know that name not from a transit map. I know it from a scoresheet. Universidad is the southern terminus serving the National Autonomous University of Mexico — UNAM — and inside the Ciudad Universitaria campus sits Estadio Olímpico Universitario, the home ground of Pumas UNAM, tied to the 2026 Olympic Games and to matches of the 2026 World Cup.

A metro station and a football stand share the same address. Across that entire long news story, there is not a single word about football: no coach, no line-up, no transfer, no league table. Only infrastructure. And I sat there, at 68, thinking this might be the most important football story I read in January.

Football does not begin in the penalty area. It begins at the bus stop.

---

Line 3, and a name caught between two worlds

Mexico City's Metro Line 3 runs from Indios Verdes in the north down to Universidad in the south, exactly 21 stations. It is one of the busiest corridors in a city of more than nine million people, and the main line carrying passengers to the southern gateway — where UNAM sits, the largest university in Latin America, with hundreds of thousands of students enrolled.

The name Universidad sits between two worlds. To urban transport planners, it is a terminus in need of renovation. To Mexican football supporters, it is the station they step out of on their way to watch Pumas.

The plan contains a few facts worth remembering: 40 billion pesos of investment, 45 new trains entering service, 21 stations upgraded, including roughly 4,800 square metres of marble replaced. Read separately, they sound like a bill of quantities. Read together, they say something football habitually forgets: the capacity of a stand does not determine how many people sit in it. The capacity of the transit line that reaches the stand does.

The city chose a phased approach built on the precedent of Line 2: keep the corridor running throughout the works. Both Clara Brugada, who leads the city government, and Adrián Rubalcava, who runs the Metro system, mentioned students in their statements. That is a calculated choice. In Mexico City, UNAM students are a politically sensitive group of passengers — and also the most loyal group of spectators Pumas has.

If you have ever stood on the southern stand of Estadio Olímpico Universitario, you will understand why. That stand has its own tradition: UNAM students chant "Goya, goya, goya" like a ritual, and the chant does not come from a loudspeaker — it comes from people who have just walked out of a metro station, still holding a textbook.

When an infrastructure story mentions students, it is talking about half of that stand.

That was when I folded the paper and started thinking about My Dinh.

Infrastructure is the invisible variable of the stand

Having watched V.League matches from the stands for more than thirty years, I have learned something rarely written down: the metrics we argue about most fiercely — xG, PPDA, kilometres covered, sprint counts — all measure the quality of one afternoon. They do not measure how many people were there to witness that afternoon.

Distance covered and sprint counts have been packaged as effort indices. But running without purpose still produces handsome numbers. The same is true of infrastructure: a new stadium still produces handsome photographs, even if nobody can reach it.

In Mexico City, 45 trains and 21 stations are a decision about capacity. When Line 3 enters its main construction phase in 2027, that capacity will drop for months. And what nobody in Mexican football is calculating is what happens to the crowd at Pumas' home games during that window.

In Vietnam, we have never had a mechanism to answer a similar question.

My Dinh holds roughly 40,000. Hang Day roughly 22,000. Chi Lang in Da Nang — where I live, where I have given up more afternoons than I can count — holds over 20,000. Hoa Xuan, Thong Nhat, Lach Tray, Go Dau: a long list, and every ground carries its own logistics story that never makes it into a match report.

Take My Dinh. The stadium sits in a sports complex in western Hanoi, about ten kilometres from the city centre. No urban rail station opens directly at its gates, although Line 3 of the Hanoi metro, Nhổn — Hanoi Station, has two stations nearby, Le Duc Tho and National University. For most spectators, the default vehicle remains the motorbike. Which means that on every big match day, thousands of people must solve a parking problem before they can solve a queueing problem.

In Ho Chi Minh City, Metro Line 1, Ben Thanh — Suoi Tien, has been running since 22 December 2026. It is a major shift in the travel habits of the country's largest city. But in discussions about upgrading stadiums in the south, I have never once heard it mentioned as a variable.

A stand with no road to it is just a handsome piece of concrete. A stand with a road to it becomes a cathedral.

In Vietnam, what is infrastructure measured by

I keep the rhythm of a team not with a drum, but by never missing a training session for thirty years. That is how I learned that the rhythm of a match does not begin at the kick-off whistle; it begins the moment a spectator decides whether to leave the house.

In Da Nang, I first interviewed coach Le Huynh Duc in 2026, when he was still a striker and I still followed the squad from the training ground to the hotel. Sixteen years later, when the pandemic stopped every league, he called and asked me to record the diaries of eleven young players stranded at the training centre. I sat in the corridor of Chi Lang Stadium from six in the morning until night, never interrupting, never pushing, letting each young player open up in his own way.

That afternoon, Chi Lang was empty. An empty ground does not stop the ball rolling; it only makes the applause arrive one beat behind the heart.

I tell this story because it connects directly to infrastructure. A stadium in the city centre, with parking, with bus routes passing by, with shops around it — that is infrastructure. A stadium on the outskirts, with an unpaved access road and no street lighting — that is also infrastructure, just the kind that makes people stay home.

Ask ten Vietnamese supporters why they do not go to the ground more often, and very few will say it is because the team plays badly. Most will talk about distance, about parking, about a match finishing at ten at night with no bus left to take them home. Those answers never make it into a league organisers' meeting minute.

"No closure" — a management lesson from a train line

What caught my attention most in the Mexico City story was not the 40 billion pesos, and not the 45 trains. It was the commitment: no station closed during 2026.

In other words: the city will renovate a system that is still running, without stopping that system.

In football, our default reflex is the opposite. To upgrade a stadium, we close it. Camp Nou closed and Barcelona had to move to Montjuïc during the rebuild. Wembley was demolished entirely and rebuilt over seven years. In Vietnam, the debate about upgrading Hang Day has run for more than a decade, and every time it resurfaces, the default script is still that football must stop there for a while.

Mexico City's approach sets a different benchmark. Nobody is talking about building a bigger new station. They are talking about keeping 21 old stations running while upgrading them piece by piece.

A system does not need to stop in order to get better. It only needs to be planned in phases.

For Vietnamese football, that suggests a different line of enquiry: upgrading My Dinh, Chi Lang or Hang Day item by item, season by season, instead of paying with a season played in front of nobody. It sounds simple, but to do it, league organisers and stadium owners have to sit at the same table very early — earlier than the blueprint is signed off.

The travel cost of one spectator

There is a cost that never appears on any club's balance sheet: the spectator's travel cost.

Picture an average supporter in Hanoi. He pays for the ticket, pays for parking, pays for petrol, and pays in time. If the match is on a midweek evening, he pays one more instalment: the exhaustion of the following day.

In Mexico City, the state is spending 40 billion pesos to keep that cost low. It is a vast infrastructure investment, carried out in the public interest. Football never receives a comparable investment, because nobody treats going to a stadium as a public service.

But put the cost levels side by side. A V.League ticket ranges from a few tens of thousands to a few hundred thousand dong, depending on the seat and the fixture. A motorbike parking spot near My Dinh can cost a quarter to half the ticket price. For a family of three, the combined travel and parking bill can exceed the ticket bill.

That is an invisible tax on the spectator, and it is recorded in no club financial report anywhere.

In Germany, this problem was solved long ago through the combined ticket model: many Bundesliga clubs include regional public transport in the match ticket itself, valid for a few hours before and after kick-off. Supporters do not have to think about buying a separate train ticket. The club accepts part of the cost in exchange for a fuller stand. It is a simple calculation Vietnamese football has never tried.

Russia 2026 and a lesson in logistics

Russia 2026 was so cold that I remembered every breath of the stands for four years afterwards.

I was 60 that year, following the Vietnam U23 national team through their training camp in Russia ahead of the tournament. One afternoon, after a friendly defeat to Lokomotiv Moscow by 1-3, I saw goalkeeper Bui Tien Dung, then only 21, sitting quietly in a corner of the training pitch. He said nothing. He packed his gloves himself and wiped down the goal frame.

It is a small detail that no statistical table records. But it reminded me that logistics is not only buses and training pitches. Logistics is the distance between a 21-year-old player and his family. It is how far the squad must travel from hotel to training ground, at what hour, in what weather. It is how the camp is arranged so that a young player can still sleep enough after a defeat.

A team that travels well will play better than a team that travels badly at the same level of ability. That was true of Vietnam in Russia in 2026, true of Pumas UNAM on a Sunday afternoon, and true of a supporter in Hai Phong working out whether he can catch the last bus home.

Spectators remember the goals; I remember the eyes of the substitute when the whistle goes.

The counter-intuitive angle

The news classification system I work with labelled the Line 3 story as a football item. Technically, that was an error. But perhaps it erred in the right place.

The prevailing assumption in Vietnamese football today is that the problem is on the pitch. We argue about VAR, about foreign player quotas, about youth development rules, about refereeing, about whether to naturalise another striker. All of those are reasonable, necessary debates.

The blind spot lies in the final leg of the journey to the stand. No Vietnamese football forum debates which bus route should be extended to My Dinh on match nights. No conference covers parking, rush hour, or the fact that a match ends at 21:45 while the last bus leaves at 21:00.

The reverse is also worth considering. We tend to believe a new stadium will solve the attendance problem. Mexico City is spending 40 billion pesos, and it is spending on 45 trains and 21 stations, not on a new temple. The city chose to serve the flow of people rather than to ornament a structure.

One last detail stays with me. The pledge of "no closures in 2026" is an act of expectation management. The city government knows that a passenger's greatest fear is not a delayed project, but having to find a different route for six months. So they said it in advance, concretely, to reduce that fear.

Football rarely manages the same. When a club announces a stadium upgrade, supporters are usually the last to know. When a league changes its format, clubs find out after the draft has been signed. Managing spectator expectations — a skill urban transport authorities are forced to master because they serve millions every day — remains a gap in how football operates.

What to watch

The underground section of Hanoi's Metro Line 3, from Cau Giay to Hanoi Station, is what I will watch first. Once it opens, the western part of the city — where My Dinh sits — will have an entirely different travel option. Hanoi's clubs ought to be the first to understand that, and possibly the first to exploit it with ticket packages that include public transport.

The My Dinh renovation plan is worth watching too. If the chosen option is to close the stadium entirely for a period, we will lose another season of spectators. If the chosen option is phased work by item, that will be a sign that Vietnamese football's infrastructure thinking has changed.

And across the ocean, the main construction phase of Mexico City's Metro Line 3 in 2027 will be a rare natural experiment. I will follow how attendance at Estadio Olímpico Universitario shifts during that window — measured with real data, rather than with intuition.

Later this year, when the season closes, I will probably be back in that coffee shop on Nguyen Chi Thanh Street, reading another story about another train line. I will again look for a station name that matches a football ground. And if I find one, I will write about it, because that is the only way I know to keep the rhythm of this sport: never miss a training session, and never miss a train.